President Obama's Violation of Separation of Power

Barack Obama And The IRS Non-Scandal

Dr. Benjamin Carson, the former director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, said he and his family were targeted by the IRS in retribution for comments critical of Barack Obama

According to Carson, audits and other harassment began in May or June of 2013, just a few months after his speech at the National Prayer Breakfast. Gradually, he added, the harassment expanded to include family members, associates, and his charitable endeavors.

"I’ve been quite -- I would say astonished at the level of hostility that I have encountered. The IRS has investigated me. They said, ‘I want to look at your real estate holdings.’ There was nothing there. ‘Well, let’s expand to an entire [year], everything.’ There was nothing there. ‘Let’s do another year.’ Finally, after a few months, they went away. But they’ve come after my family, they’ve come after my friends, they’ve come after associates,"

But it's all just a big coincidence...





Lois Lerner did nothing wrong, but she won't testify regarding the actions that occurred under her direction.




Although emails has surfaced recently that indicate that maybe Lois was indeed creating new rules withing in the IRS would place applications from Conservative groups on their own "Double Secret Probation" that would discourage them from moving forward.    

"The Treasury Department and Lerner started devising the new rules “off-plan,” meaning that their plans would not be published on the public schedule. They planned the new rules in 2012, while the IRS targeting of conservative groups was in full swing, and not after the scandal broke in order to clarify regulations as the administration has suggested.

The rules place would place much more stringent controls on what would be considered political activity by the IRS, effectively limiting the standard practices of a wide array of non-profit groups."

Maybe she was actually able to put her plan into place:





But as we have learned from MSNBC, all these Tea Party groups are evil and their money is corrupting and overpowering the American political process. 

Looking at these numbers, keep in mind that the rules that the Democrats and their political appointees withing the IRS are proposing provide exemptions for unions.  Because everyone knows that unions are not political. Plus, we have receive the absolute final word from no less than The President of The United States Barak Obama, "Not even a smidgen of corruption".  Right?

"IRS official Sarah Hall Ingram made 155 visits to the White House to meet with a top Obama White House official with whom she exchanged confidential taxpayer information over email.

Of Ingram’s 165 White House meetings with White House staff, a staggering 155 of them were hosted by deputy assistant to the president for health policy Jeanne Lambrew"

But this is just a bunch of racist Tea Party kooks trying to bring down Barack Obama by any means they can.  If there were actually anything to this alleged "scandal", the press would all over this like they are on Chris Christie's bridge closing.  



But in the words of Hilary Clinton, "What difference, at this point, does it make?"

So Many LIes, No One Cares Anymore

Uhhhh.....

Hitler Lost His Doctor, And So Will You

New study from Harvard University showing that Medicare patients used the Emergency Room 40% more than people with no insurance, which is about the exact opposite negative number projected by the Democrats when they were selling ObamaCare as cutting long term healthcare costs. And the study showed the vast majority of those ER visits were non-emergency issues better suited for a primary care physician. Opponents (including me) had predicted that with fewer 'in network' options, non-emergency use of ER services would increase, not decrease. If this trend plays out across the country, ObamaCare will increase US healthcare expense and place additional stress on ER service providers. Expect to see more privately owned, non-critical ER centers open up that do not accept Medicare patients, as people with good insurance will look to avoid the chaos of hospital ERs and seek out a higher level of service.

When asked about the cost reduction claims made in selling Obamacare to the public Vs the finding of the published Harvard study, Jonathan Gruber, health economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and considered co-author of the Affordable Care Act along with Dr. Zeke Emanuel said, "That was sometimes a misleading motivator for the Affordable Care Act. The law isn't designed to save money. It's designed to improve health, and that's going to cost money."

And here is the other shoe waiting to drop. The government's own estimate, from June 17, 2010, on how many people on group health care plans will lose their plan when that mandate kicks in. This screen shot of the Federal Register shows the odds of you losing your group plan, as well as confirms that whole, "If you like your plan..." was known at the time to be a complete lie, and EVERYONE in the government knew it.

If I were a cynical person, I'd suspect that is why President Obama pushed the deadline for the employer mandate until after the 2014 midterm elections.